August 10, 2022

Mumbai: Client panel points discover to Mahim restaurant for levying service cost | Photograph: Pexels

A metropolis Client Disputes Redressal Fee has issued a discover to a Mahim fantastic eating restaurant in a criticism filed earlier than it by a lady by which she demanded damages for being compelled to pay Rs. 75.30 as service cost when she went to dine there in Jan final yr.

Prabhadevi resident Ridhina Nagwekar filed a criticism in opposition to the supervisor of Thangabali restaurant’s Mahim department. In her criticism filed via advocate Prashant Nayak she has demanded a refund of Rs. 75.30 and Rs. 2 lakhs as compensation for the psychological agony and litigation bills she was made to undergo. The discover was issued by the patron panel on June 24 after it recorded that it heard the advocate’s arguments and admitted the criticism in opposition to the other occasion below the Client Safety Act. It has directed that the restaurant file its response.

The 34-year-old said in her criticism, by which she has connected the copy of the invoice from the restaurant, that she had been to the restaurant to dine on Jan 30 final yr and was illegally charged a service cost in her invoice. She stated the restaurant issued her a invoice of Rs. 1,393 comprising Rs. 75.30 as an unlawful service cost included in it. Nagwekar stated she approached the responsibility supervisor and defined to him such a service cost can’t be mandatorily imposed on the client and is voluntary within the type of a tip. Her criticism said that she additional defined it can’t be charged as a hard and fast part a part of the invoice as per provisions of legislation and is to be given by clients as per their discretion if they’re glad with the service. She stated despite this, she was compelled by the supervisor to pay the service cost quantity.

See also  Mumbai: As mercury rises, BEST passengers complain about non-functioning ACs inside these buses

“A set share of the invoice can’t be levied as a service cost and the identical can’t be made mandatorily payable by clients..” her criticism had said. It added that the restaurant and its supervisor are collectively accountable for deficiency in service and unfair commerce practices below the Client Safety Act for charging her so.

(To obtain our E-paper on whatsapp every day, please click on right here. To obtain it on Telegram, please click on right here. We allow sharing of the paper’s PDF on WhatsApp and different social media platforms.)